基于六自由度运动轨迹的晃车仪测试技术

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.11.11

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4331 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The test method of the existing swing vehicle was single, which was difficult to meet the requirements of actual working conditions. Based on the 6 degree of freedom platform, the trajectory of its composite motion is used to measure the amplitude of the composite vibration angle through data fusion with the gyroscope sensor. In order to improve the solution accuracy of the wobble vehicle, the linear angular compound vibration was quantified and the amplitude of vibration angle was measured by gyroscope, and the inclination effect of the single acceleration sensor was corrected under the compound vibration, and the expanded uncertainty evaluation was conducted on the reference frequency points after the fusion solution. The results showed that the relative expanded uncertainties of the linear and angular vibrations of the entire testing system after the fusion of the data of the gyroscope and the wobble instrument were 0.36% and 0.08%, respectively, expanding the standard testing conditions of the wobble instrument.

Key words： metrology swing vehicle instrument 6 degree of freedom compound vibration sensor data fusion

Received: 19 August 2022 Published: 17 November 2023

PACS:

TB936

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HAN Zhi
	CHEN Chun-Lei
	CHENG Zhao-Yang
	ZHAO Zi-Shen
	LIU Kai

Cite this article:

HAN Zhi,CHEN Chun-Lei,CHENG Zhao-Yang, et al. Testing Technology of Swing Vehicle Instrument Based on 6 Degree of Freedom Trajectory[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 44(11): 1706-1712.

URL:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.11.11 OR http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/EN/Y2023/V44/I11/1706

［5］	赵国栋, 赵力, 任涛龙, 等. 160km/h电传动内燃综合巡检车研制［J］. 铁道技术监督, 2019, 47(5):21-26.
［2］	Singh S, Kumar R, Kumar U. Applying human factor analysis tools to a railway brake and wheel maintenance facility ［J］. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 2015, 21(1):89-99.
	Zhao G D, Zhao L, Ren H L, et al. Research and development of integrated electric drive internal combustion inspection vehicle with 160 km/h［J］. Railway Quality Control, 2019, 47(5):21-26.
	Zhang Y, Yang F, You M X, et al. Research on Evaluation model of track irregularity based on gradient boosting decision tree［J］. Railway Engineering, 2020, 60(8):111-114.
	Wang C, Cai C G, Yang M, et al. Vibration Calibration Method Based on the Decoding of Heterodyne Interferometer Output S/PDIF Digital Signal［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(3):282-286.
［11］	ISO 16063-11:1999 (E) Methods for the calibration of vibration and shock transducers Part 11: Primary vibration calibration by laser interferometry［S］. 2011.
［13］	杨明, 蔡晨光, 刘志华, 等. 基于外差激光干涉法的三轴向振动绝对校准方法研究［J］. 计量学报, 2018, 39(2):201-206.
［14］	JJF 1059—1999 测量不确定度评定与表示［S］. 1999.
［16］	杨巧玉. 加速度计参考点灵敏度幅值的不确定度评定［J］. 计量与测试技术, 2007, 34(12): 39-41.
［3］	朱永胜. 车载式线路检查仪研制与应用［J］. 山西建筑, 2019, 45(8):197-199.
	Ren Z W. Discussion on safety production management of railway works［J］. Architectural Engineering Technology And Design, 2017, 36(27):201-202.
	Bai J, Hu H B. Estimates and Its Corresponding Uncertainty Evaluation of Parameters for Regression Model in Metrology［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 1683-1688.
［15］	方兴华, 宋明顺, 顾龙芳, 等. 基于自适应蒙特卡罗方法的测量不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2016, 37(4): 452-456.
	Yang Q Y. Evaluation the sensitivity amplitude uncertainty of reference point for acceleration sensor［J］. Metrology & Measurement Technique, 2007,34(12):39-41.
［4］	靳守杰, 魏志恒, 王文斌, 等. 城市轨道交通综合检测车应用分析［J］. 现代城市轨道交通, 2021(11):69-73.
［10］	王朝, 蔡晨光, 杨明, 等. 基于激光干涉仪数字信号解码的振动校准方法［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(3):282-286.
	Fang X H, Song M S, Gu L F, et al. Application of adaptive monte carlo method on measurement uncertainty evaluation［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2016, 37(4): 452-456.
［8］	张海龙, 王文飞, 姚欣. 铁路轨道综合检测系统研究［J］. 中国铁路, 2021(6):79-84.
［9］	任占武. 铁路工务安全生产管理探讨［J］. 建筑工程技术与设计, 2017, 36(27) :201-202.
［1］	Sara B, Joo S, Massimo L. Optimization of maintenance strategies for railway track-bed considering probabilistic degradation models and different reliability levels［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 207:107359.
	Zhanh H L, Wang W F, Yao X. Research on comprehensive inspection system of railway track［J］. China Railway, 2021(6):79-84.
［15］	白杰,胡红波. 计量中回归模型参数值及其不确定度评估［J］. 计量学报, 2022, 43(12): 1683-1688.
［7］	于东东. 普速铁路线路动静态轨检数据综合分析应用研究［D］. 北京:中国铁道科学研究院, 2021.
	Yang M, Cai C G, Liu Z H, et al. Research on method of the triaxial primary vibration calibration usingthe heterodyne interferometry［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2018, 39(2):201-206.
［6］	张煜, 杨飞, 尤明熙, 等. 基于GBDT的轨道不平顺状态评价模型研究［J］. 铁道建筑, 2020, 60(8):111-114.
［12］	ISO 16063-41, Methods for the calibration of vibration and shock transducers: Part 41:Calibration of laser vibrometers［S］. 2011.