|
|
Uncertainty Evaluation for the Determination of Amaranthus Red in Wine Samples by High Performance Liquid Chromatography |
MA Kang1,LI Xiao-Jia 2,CUI Meng-meng3,MA Lian-di1 |
1. National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China;
2. School of Chemistry and Biological, Beijing University of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China;
3. College of Chemistry, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China |
|
|
Abstract Sources of measurement for amaranthus red in wine samples by high performance liquid chromatography are determined through studying the whole process of analytical results. The uncertainties of analytical result are evaluated by a metrological model of uncertainty. The standard uncertainty for analytical results for amaranthus red in wine samples is mainly consisted of uncertainty of solution reference material of amaranthus red, preparation of work standard solution, calibration curve using the least squares method, preparation for real wine sample, measured repeatability, method recovery and so on. Relative expanded uncertainties for two real wine sample with different content are evaluated and they are 2.6% and 2.2%(k=2). Evaluation of analytical results of two samples with different content indicated that main resource of uncertainty are measured repeatability and calibration curve.
|
|
|
|
|
[1]Souquet J M, Labarbe B, Guerneve C L, et al. Phenolic composition of grape stems[J].J Agric Food Chem, 2000, 48 (4): 1076-1080.
[2]Ryan J M, Revilla E. Anthocyanin composition of cabernet sauvignon and tempranillo grapes at different stages of ripening[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2003, 51 (11): 3372-3378.
[3]国家质量监督检验检疫总局. GB 15037—2006, 葡萄酒标准[S].
[4]中华人民共和国卫生部. GB 2760—2011, 食品添加剂使用标准[S].
[5]中华人民共和国卫生部. GB 2758—2012, 发酵酒及其配制酒卫生标准[S].
[6]谢娅黎, 陈欣欣, 冯勇, 等. 市售红葡萄酒中甜味剂以及人工合成色素使用情况分析[J]. 现代食品科技, 2009, 35(12): 1482.
[7]Ma K, Wang H F, Zhao M, et al. Purity determination and uncertainty evaluation of theophylline by mass balance method, high performance liquid chromatography and differential scanning calorimetry[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2009, 650(2): 227-233.
[8]马康, 赵敏, 王海峰, 等. 茶碱标准物质的研制与定值[J]. 分析测试学报, 2011, 30(4): 418-424.
[9]冯静,王海娇, 何超君, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定地下水中苯并(a)芘的不确定度评定[J]. 岩矿测试, 2011, 30(5): 617-622.
[10]国家质量技术监督局. JJG10 59.1—2011, 测量不确定度评定与表示[S].
[11]ISO Guide35 2006 Reference Materials-general and Statistical Principles for Certification [S].
[12]国家质量监督检验检疫总局. JJG 646—2006, 移液器检定规程[S].
[13]国家质量监督检验检疫总局. JJG 196—2006, 常用玻璃量器检定规程[S].
[14]马康, 杨亚楠, 刑金京, 等. 诱惑红溶液标准物质的研制及不确定度评定[J]. 分析测试学报, 2012, 31(3): 296-301.
[15]李松, 饶竹. 气相色谱法测定地下水中六六六结果的不确定度评定[J]. 岩矿测试, 2008, 27(4): 295-298. |
|
|
|